these pants are so cute but unfortunately they do not hold their shape. when i put them on they fit like a glove but after sitting they are a hot mess. maybe size down since they stretch out so badly? don’t know but it is unfortunate because i love the style.
got a 16s and these were too long for me. might have been ok with boots. other pants from the same company fit well for the 16s size- my friend speculated that maybe they were longer on purposes because of flares.
in i early to mid 70’s in high school this was the style of choice for jeans . paired it with a midrift top with high waisted bell bottom jeans but little more flared from knees down not tight and then belled at bottom like early 60’s to early 70’s .this style was more school friendly than bells. fit more body shapes also and was flattering to many teens pre teens that were maturing and didn’t want hip hugger tight through thighs then looked like bells .you wore with latest platform shoes due to lengths were long. midriff tops that covered midriff skin or you were sent home. they were more flared than tight and belles from knee but were snug from hip to below knee. trouser almost but curved slightly. fit below waist but not extreme below belly button. the more extreme were for weekends at parties no principles or teachers checking shirt lengths. yes with platform shoes . these styles accommodated classroom and office no skin unless play volleyball in gym but we had to wear gym clothes but our 1 piece short body suit gym clothes satisfied any sports wel played. polyester was king then , ugh. sweaty fabric but was wash and wear,mom’s loved it. the hip hugger styles tight through rear to below knee that was indeed big bell was more weekend parties dance clubs that required exceptionally toned body then very few could pull it off. i could not. it require a little stomach showing. length was long on pants but the mile high platform shoes made the perfect length . i look back now and think how did we stood wearing 20lbs of fabric from waist down especially in the south . it was very hot
the fit wasn't for me. lots of extra fabric between the belly and crotch. the legs were so wide, definitely a bell bottom. i ordered size 18, i'm 201 lb, 5'2.
these jeans didn’t have as much stretch as i expected and the jean material was rough, reminded me of cheap overalls in feel and color. the first time i washed them, the bottom hem folded and i had to binder clip them down. i eventually just cut off the bottom hem. now i wish i wouldn’t have because i’d return them.
they were okay i guess if you like the color fade on your but. i however don’t. also i don’t have a waist so they fit throughly the hips but the waist band was clearly from a curvy girl. super long that was the only good thing.
had high hopes for these jeans but sadly had to return. they must run really small because i couldn't get them up my legs in my typical size. i also didn't like the streaks of the dye so i decided not to try them in a larger size. i don't recommend.
it's an okay pair or jeans. very long. feels more on the light side. my biggest complaint is they are being sold as lee jeans but what arrived was an off brand vipones.
i love the flare and high waist of these jeans. however, so sad that at 5'2 a 8short still needs to be hemmed about 2-4 inches. i hemmed one pair myself, but due to the stretchy material it doesn't look well. on the fence if i will keep the second pair and pay to have professional alterations.
the flare on these was perfect, however they ran about a size too small, were high waisted despite being described as mid rise, and have a strange grain/texture in the denim that reminds me of old lady jeans. had to return them.
裤腿宽
设计过于喇叭状
形状保持性
设计目的
材质
温度与面料
材料质量
宽度和面料
材质僵硬
较薄的材质
裤腿过宽
材质粗糙
颜色和质感
材质较次
颜色褪色
裤腿宽
外观问题
材质感知
弹性面料
材料廉价
裤腿过宽
布料质感问题